Commercial Litigation
Contract, shareholder, IP and technology disputes before the Commercial Courts and High Courts, from urgent interim relief to judgment and enforcement.
Machine translation by Google in 249 languages. The English text prevails.
Corporate practice
Good arbitration starts with the clause. We draft clauses that work, run proceedings efficiently, and enforce the award.
Domestic and international arbitration, mediation and the enforcement of awards, from drafting the clause to defending the award in court.
Most of the fights we see about arbitration are about the clause: what the seat is, how the tribunal is appointed, and whether the agreement was stamped. Indian courts now treat a named “venue” as the seat unless something points the other way. They do not allow one party alone to appoint a sole arbitrator, or to control the panel. And an unstamped arbitration agreement is not void (see our note on Interplay).
A challenge under section 34 must be filed within three months, plus a further 30 days for sufficient cause. The grounds are narrow, and courts do not re-examine the merits. A Constitution Bench held in 2025 that courts may modify an award only in limited circumstances. Filing a challenge does not automatically stay enforcement. Foreign awards from New York Convention countries notified by India are enforced under Part II of the Act.
The Mediation Act, 2023 gives mediated settlement agreements the force of a decree. Pre-institution mediation is already mandatory for most commercial suits.
In a domestic arbitration, pleadings must be completed within six months of the tribunal being constituted, and the award is due within twelve months of completion of pleadings. The parties can extend that by six months; any further extension needs the court’s approval (section 29A). For international commercial arbitrations seated in India, the time limit is only an aim.
Yes, but on narrow grounds and within three months of receiving it, extendable by 30 days for sufficient cause (section 34). Courts do not review the merits. A challenge does not automatically stay enforcement; the court must grant a stay, usually on conditions.
Yes. A seven-judge bench of the Supreme Court held in In re Interplay (December 2023) that an unstamped or insufficiently stamped agreement is not void but inadmissible until the duty is paid, which is a curable defect. Stamping objections are for the arbitral tribunal, not a ground for the court to refuse to refer the dispute.
Related practice areas
Contract, shareholder, IP and technology disputes before the Commercial Courts and High Courts, from urgent interim relief to judgment and enforcement.
Drafting, negotiating and reviewing the contracts businesses run on: supply, services, technology, distribution, franchise, confidentiality and more.
Contract structuring and negotiation, corporate policies, outsourced counsel, and corporate training on IP, POSH and the DPDP Act.
Contact
Z-29, Block Z, Hauz Khas, New Delhi 110016, India
info@brb-legal.com · +91 11 4058 2711
Bar Council of India rules
This website has been designed only for the purposes of dissemination of basic information on BRB Legal; information which is otherwise available on the internet, various public platforms, and social media. Careful attention has been given to ensure that the information provided herein is accurate and up-to-date. However, BRB Legal is not responsible for any reliance that a reader places on such information and shall not be liable for any loss or damage caused due to any inaccuracy in or exclusion of any information, or its interpretation thereof. The reader is advised to confirm the veracity of the same from independent and expert sources.
This website is not an attempt to advertise or solicit clients and does not seek to create or invite any lawyer-client relationship. The links provided on this website are to facilitate access to basic information on BRB Legal, and, to share the various thought leadership initiatives undertaken by it. The content herein or on such links should not be construed as a legal reference or legal advice. Readers are advised not to act on any information contained herein or on the links and should refer to legal counsels and experts in their respective jurisdictions for further information and to determine its impact.
BRB Legal advises against the use of the communication platform provided on this website for the exchange of any confidential, business, or politically sensitive information. The user is requested to use his or her judgment and the exchange of any such information shall be solely at the user’s risk.
This website uses no advertising cookies. Wix, which hosts it, sets a few cookies to keep the site secure and to count visits, and your browser stores your acceptance of this notice and, if you choose one, your language. See cookies and browser storage.
By choosing “I accept”, you confirm that you are seeking information about BRB Legal of your own accord. Read our full disclaimer, Terms of Use and Privacy Policy.