- Case number
- C.A.(COMM.IPD-TM) 22/2022
- Court
- Delhi High Court
- Date of judgment
- Judge
- Sanjeev Narula
- Outcome
- Set aside
Headnote
Refusal under section 11(1)(a) and (b) set aside. Of the cited marks two were likely to be removed for non-renewal and one stood refused, while the only surviving citation was shown to be unused on e-commerce portals. The appellant already held a registration for a mark containing the same element, in use since 2011. Mark allowed to be advertised before acceptance under the proviso to section 20.
Headnote by BRB Legal, written from the judgment: a summary for reference, not legal advice. Read the judgment itself before relying on it.