- Case number
- C.A.(COMM.IPD-TM) 112/2021
- Court
- Delhi High Court
- Date of judgment
- Judge
- Amit Bansal
- Outcome
- Set aside
Headnote
Refusal under sections 9(1)(a), 9(1)(b), 11(1)(a) and 11(1)(b) set aside. The Statement of Grounds gave no reason why the word mark was not distinctive or was descriptive, and nearly a decade of use with documents on record showed acquired distinctiveness. Appeal allowed and the application sent to advertisement under the proviso to section 20.
Headnote by BRB Legal, written from the judgment: a summary for reference, not legal advice. Read the judgment itself before relying on it.