- Case number
- C.A.(COMM.IPD-TM) 2/2023
- Court
- Delhi High Court
- Date of judgment
- Judge
- Sanjeev Narula
- Outcome
- Rectification allowed
Headnote
Refusal under section 11(1)(a) and (b) and section 18(4) set aside. Of the three cited marks the first was likely to be removed for non-renewal, the second covered different goods and the third had been abandoned. The commonality extended only to the generic word GEM, while the subject mark was a composite device of stripes and stylised words, and the same mark already stood registered for the appellant in seven other classes.
Headnote by BRB Legal, written from the judgment: a summary for reference, not legal advice. Read the judgment itself before relying on it.