- Case number
- W.P.(IPD) 2/2024
- Court
- Madras High Court
- Date of judgment
- Judge
- N. Seshasayee
- Outcome
- Set aside
Headnote
A second hearing notice on the same application was challenged on the same ground as the first, that the opponents' written statements had never been served, so no reply statement could be filed under rule 55(4). The Office again conceded the omission was an inadvertent mistake.
Disposition
Disposed of. Hearing notice of 19 January 2024 set aside.
Headnote by BRB Legal, written from the judgment: a summary for reference, not legal advice. Read the judgment itself before relying on it.