- Case number
- W.P. Nos. 5233 and 5239 of 2020
- Court
- Madras High Court
- Date of judgment
- Judge
- SENTHILKUMAR RAMAMOORTHY W.P.Nos
- Outcome
- Disposed of
Headnote
Two writ petitions against a refusal to extend time for filing evidence in support of an opposition were disposed of as infructuous, the opposed mark having been registered in the meantime and a rectification petition already filed. The Registrar was directed to decide that rectification within six months. The question whether section 131(1) empowers an extension of the time for evidence was argued but left undecided.
Disposition
Writ petitions disposed of as infructuous, with a direction on the pending rectification. No costs.
Headnote by BRB Legal, written from the judgment: a summary for reference, not legal advice. Read the judgment itself before relying on it.