IP Case Digest · Trade Marks

Utkrishta Kumar v. The Registrar of Trade Marks, TMA/8/2022

Case number
TMA/8/2022
Date of judgment
Judge
Ravi Krishan Kapur
Outcome
Remanded

Headnote

The conclusion in the order was not supported by any reasons at all, the examination report was mechanically followed without its contents being discussed, and only the first word of a composite mark was considered, leaving out the suffix, the byline and the device elements. The Registry's own counsel accepted that there were no reasons and asked for a remand.

Read the judgment (PDF)

Disposition

Set aside and remanded for fresh adjudication in accordance with law.

Headnote by BRB Legal, written from the judgment: a summary for reference, not legal advice. Read the judgment itself before relying on it.