- Case number
- (T)CMA(PT) 1/2024
- Court
- Madras High Court
- Date of judgment
- Judge
- P. B. Balaji
- Outcome
- Remanded
Headnote
A cryptic decision with no discussion at all of how the invention was obvious over any of the cited documents. The Form 3 statement had disclosed a United States grant made after that office considered one of those very documents, which went unmentioned, and the synergistic effect demonstrated in the written submissions was neither considered nor discussed.
Disposition
Allowed. Matter remanded for fresh consideration.
Headnote by BRB Legal, written from the judgment: a summary for reference, not legal advice. Read the judgment itself before relying on it.