- Case number
- C.A.(COMM.IPD-TM) 161/2021
- Court
- Delhi High Court
- Date of judgment
- Judge
- Prathiba M. Singh
- Outcome
- Allowed
Headnote
A one-line order refused the mark as objectionable under sections 9 and 11, where the examination report had raised only a relative ground under section 11. Two of the three cited marks were abandoned. For the third, counsel offered to delete from the specification the one description of goods the two marks had in common, and the application proceeded for the rest.
Disposition
Allowed. The application to proceed for advertisement for the restricted list of goods in class 19.
Headnote by BRB Legal, written from the judgment: a summary for reference, not legal advice. Read the judgment itself before relying on it.