- Case number
- C.A.(COMM.IPD-TM) 144/2022
- Court
- Delhi High Court
- Date of judgment
- Judge
- C. Hari Shankar
- Outcome
- Dismissed
Headnote
A proposed to be used application was refused over a phonetically near identical mark registered earlier for like agricultural goods. Counsel could not say when the appellant began using its mark, or whether the cited proprietor was using its own. The appeal was dismissed as bereft of merit.
Disposition
Dismissed.
Headnote by BRB Legal, written from the judgment: a summary for reference, not legal advice. Read the judgment itself before relying on it.