- Case number
- C.A.(COMM.IPD-TM) 123/2022
- Court
- Delhi High Court
- Date of judgment
- Judge
- Sanjeev Narula
- Outcome
- Set aside
Headnote
No hearing was given before the application was refused. The Registry disputed that but was content for directions to issue. The applicant was prima facie already using the mark commercially and held a registration for a related device, so refusal without a hearing had substantially affected his rights, and a fresh hearing was directed with the merits untouched.
Disposition
Allowed. Impugned order set aside. The Court expressly did not examine the merits of the case.
Headnote by BRB Legal, written from the judgment: a summary for reference, not legal advice. Read the judgment itself before relying on it.