- Case number
- (T)CMA(TM) 58/2023
- Court
- Madras High Court
- Date of judgment
- Judge
- Senthilkumar Ramamoorthy
- Outcome
- Allowed
Headnote
The Registry objected to a three-word mark by combining one word taken from each of three different cited marks, a fusion unknown to trade mark law. The order itself said only that the mark was objectionable under sections 9 and 11, which is completely devoid of reasons, and the applicant had claimed and evidenced use from 2006.
Disposition
Allowed. The application to proceed to advertisement on terms. Not binding on opponents.
Headnote by BRB Legal, written from the judgment: a summary for reference, not legal advice. Read the judgment itself before relying on it.