- Court
- Madras High Court
- Date of judgment
- Judge
- N. Seshasayee
- Outcome
- Remanded
Headnote
The application was rejected essentially for insufficiency of description, a ground neither the First Examination Report nor the hearing notice had ever indicated. The applicant would therefore have had no opportunity to supply the description the Controller had in mind, and the Controller did not engage with inventive step at all.
Disposition
Allowed. Impugned order set aside and the matter remanded for de novo consideration.
Headnote by BRB Legal, written from the judgment: a summary for reference, not legal advice. Read the judgment itself before relying on it.