- Case number
- (T)CMA(PT) 193/2023
- Court
- Madras High Court
- Date of judgment
- Outcome
- Set aside
Headnote
The order extracted the original and amended claims, asserted that the amendment lacked support and invoked section 59, without explaining how or how far the amended claim exceeded the specification. The written submissions answering the closest prior art were not examined at all.
Disposition
Allowed. Order of refusal set aside.
Headnote by BRB Legal, written from the judgment: a summary for reference, not legal advice. Read the judgment itself before relying on it.