- Case number
- (T)CMA(TM) 148/2023
- Court
- Madras High Court
- Date of judgment
- Judge
- Senthilkumar Ramamoorthy
- Outcome
- Set aside
Headnote
The whole of the operative order read that the mark was objectionable under section 9 or 11 and was accordingly refused, followed by the standard invitation to ask for grounds. A quasi judicial authority cannot fight shy of providing reasons for its decision, whatever the rule about grounds says.
Disposition
Disposed of. Order of refusal set aside.
Headnote by BRB Legal, written from the judgment: a summary for reference, not legal advice. Read the judgment itself before relying on it.