- Case number
- (T)CMA(PT) 111/2023
- Court
- Madras High Court
- Date of judgment
- Outcome
- Remanded
Headnote
Two defects. The order set out the two cited documents but discussed neither the reply to the First Examination Report nor the written submissions filed after the hearing. And although the hearing notice had objected under section 10(4)(c) to four specified claims, which the applicant then deleted, the order refused claims 9 to 24 under that section, a range never put to the applicant and on which it had no opportunity to be heard.
Disposition
Allowed. Impugned order set aside and the matter remanded for de novo consideration.
Headnote by BRB Legal, written from the judgment: a summary for reference, not legal advice. Read the judgment itself before relying on it.