- Case number
- (T)CMA(TM) 162/2023
- Court
- Madras High Court
- Date of judgment
- Judge
- Senthilkumar Ramamoorthy
- Outcome
- Set aside
Headnote
The order referred to both sections 9 and 11 where the examination report referred only to section 11, and called for interference on that ground. In any event the application was for a device mark in relation to services, a market place for farmers and artisans, while the citations were word marks registered for goods.
Disposition
Set aside. The Registry directed to accept the application for advertisement. Not binding on opponents.
Headnote by BRB Legal, written from the judgment: a summary for reference, not legal advice. Read the judgment itself before relying on it.