- Case number
- (T)CMA(PT) 5/2023
- Court
- Madras High Court
- Date of judgment
- Judge
- N. Seshasayee
- Outcome
- Remanded
Headnote
Two of the documents relied on had come into existence after the application for grant was filed, so they were not prior art at all, a fact the applicant had not realised when filing its written submissions. The Controller had also confined her objections to two named claims and then rejected the application without considering the rest.
Disposition
Allowed. Impugned proceedings set aside and the matter remanded for de novo consideration.
Headnote by BRB Legal, written from the judgment: a summary for reference, not legal advice. Read the judgment itself before relying on it.