IP Case Digest · Patents

Microsoft Technology Licensing, LLC v. The Assistant Controller of Patents and Designs and Anr., CMA(PT) 41/2023

Case number
CMA(PT) 41/2023
Date of judgment
Outcome
Set aside

Headnote

A divisional application was refused on three grounds, that no statement under section 8 had been filed, that the divisional was covered by the parent, and that the claims exceeded the specification. Three such statements had in fact been filed, and a hundred and fifty five page submission was disposed of in about forty eight hours.

Read the judgment (PDF)

Disposition

Allowed. Order of refusal set aside.

Headnote by BRB Legal, written from the judgment: a summary for reference, not legal advice. Read the judgment itself before relying on it.