- Case number
- (T)CMA(PT) 211/2023
- Court
- Madras High Court
- Date of judgment
- Outcome
- Remanded
Headnote
The order held the invention to lack an inventive step without discussing the cited document at all, and concluded that both section 2(1)(ja) and section 3(k) stood in the way of grant without any reasons substantiating that decision. The applicant was given liberty on remand to put further submissions beyond those already before the Controller.
Disposition
Allowed. Matter remitted for fresh consideration by a different Patent Controller.
Headnote by BRB Legal, written from the judgment: a summary for reference, not legal advice. Read the judgment itself before relying on it.