- Case number
- W.P.(IPD)No.15872 of 2021
- Court
- Madras High Court
- Date of judgment
- Judge
- P. B. Balaji W. P
- Outcome
- Set aside
Headnote
A renewal form filed early was rightly rejected under rule 63, but the fee was encashed and the fresh in time form filed in November 2006 was never processed. The mark was removed in 2010. There was no reason to reject an application that satisfied the rule, particularly after taking the fee.
Disposition
Allowed. The communication of August 2013 set aside.
Also listed as
- Mahendra Perfumery Works, V. Office of the Controller General of Patents, Designs & Trade Marks & The Registrar of Trade MarksWP.15872/2021
Headnote by BRB Legal, written from the judgment: a summary for reference, not legal advice.