- Case number
- (T)CMA(TM) 144/2023
- Court
- Madras High Court
- Date of judgment
- Judge
- Senthilkumar Ramamoorthy
- Outcome
- Set aside
Headnote
The elements of the mark were derived from the subject matter, one from urea or urine and the other from a kidney supplement, and the protection ordinarily extended to a mark built from derived elements is lower than for an arbitrary or fanciful one. With the reason for adoption explained and many marks sharing those elements already on the register, the mark was accepted.
Disposition
Allowed. Impugned order set aside; the Registry directed to accept the application for advertisement. Not binding on opponents.
Headnote by BRB Legal, written from the judgment: a summary for reference, not legal advice. Read the judgment itself before relying on it.