- Case number
- (T)CMA(TM) 103/2023
- Court
- Madras High Court
- Date of judgment
- Judge
- Senthilkumar Ramamoorthy
- Outcome
- Remanded
Headnote
Opposition deemed abandoned under Rule 45(2) because the letter electing not to adduce evidence was emailed to the Mumbai office rather than Chennai. Set aside: the communication was addressed to the Chennai Registrar, so there was substantial compliance with Rule 45(1). Grant of a registration certificate during a timely appeal under interim stay does not make the appeal infructuous. Remanded for decision on merits in three months.
Headnote by BRB Legal, written from the judgment: a summary for reference, not legal advice. Read the judgment itself before relying on it.