- Court
- Delhi High Court
- Date of judgment
- Judge
- V. Kameswar Rao
- Outcome
- Set aside
Headnote
Ex parte ad interim injunction set aside. The Division Bench held this was a fit case in which notice ought to have been issued to the defendant before any interim relief, given the competing claims to proprietorship and the appellant's prior and extensive use of the marks. On maintainability, it held, following Rajesh Batra v. Grandlay Electricals, that an appeal against an ex parte ad interim injunction is maintainable, and that the recent decisions relied on by the respondent did not hold otherwise but merely declined interference on their own facts.
Headnote by BRB Legal, written from the judgment: a summary for reference, not legal advice. Read the judgment itself before relying on it.