- Case number
- C.A.(COMM.IPD-TM) 124/2022
- Court
- Delhi High Court
- Date of judgment
- Judge
- Sanjeev Narula
- Outcome
- Set aside
Headnote
Of the four cited marks one was the applicant's own and one had been abandoned. For the remaining two the applicant produced letters of consent from the registered proprietor, together with registrations of the identical mark obtained in other jurisdictions on the strength of the same consents, which indicated co-existence.
Disposition
Allowed. Impugned orders set aside; the Registry directed to process the application.
Headnote by BRB Legal, written from the judgment: a summary for reference, not legal advice. Read the judgment itself before relying on it.