- Case number
- C.A.(COMM.IPD-TM) 48/2022
- Court
- Delhi High Court
- Date of judgment
- Judge
- Sanjeev Narula
- Outcome
- Set aside
Headnote
A device mark was refused for want of distinctiveness. The applicant and its sister concern already held registrations for similar marks in the same three classes, and the Registry had registered a mark differing from this one only by the inclusion of the names of four cities. The sister concern had given its no-objection.
Disposition
Allowed. Impugned order set aside; the Registry directed to process the application.
Headnote by BRB Legal, written from the judgment: a summary for reference, not legal advice. Read the judgment itself before relying on it.