- Case number
- C.A.(COMM.IPD-PAT) 138/2022
- Court
- Delhi High Court
- Date of judgment
- Judge
- Amit Bansal
- Outcome
- Remanded
Headnote
Allowed and remanded. The refusal of an application for a field adjustable impact jar jumped to the conclusion that the invention lacked inventive step with no discussion of why the prior art applied, despite a reply distinguishing D1 and D2 on the absence of an externally accessible adjustor and adjustment window.
Headnote by BRB Legal, written from the judgment: a summary for reference, not legal advice. Read the judgment itself before relying on it.