- Case number
- CMA(PT) 6/2023
- Court
- Madras High Court
- Date of judgment
- Judge
- Senthilkumar Ramamoorthy
- Outcome
- Set aside
Headnote
The second examination report's objections were met by converting a storage medium claim to a method claim and deleting another. The application was refused for claims not being in sequential order and for disregarding what was said at the hearing. Procedural lapses in numbering do not justify rejection; the applicant could have been asked to fix them.
Disposition
Allowed. Order of refusal set aside.
Headnote by BRB Legal, written from the judgment: a summary for reference, not legal advice. Read the judgment itself before relying on it.