- Case number
- IPDTMA/4/2024
- Court
- Calcutta High Court
- Date of judgment
- Judge
- Krishna Rao
- Outcome
- Remanded
Headnote
The hearing was by video and was disrupted by connectivity problems. Two days later the applicant wrote saying it had been unable to make proper submissions and asked for another opportunity, got no response, and a year later the application was refused. That alone was enough to set the order aside, without going into the merits.
Disposition
Set aside and quashed, the matter remanded. The Court expressly declined to go into the further merits.
Headnote by BRB Legal, written from the judgment: a summary for reference, not legal advice. Read the judgment itself before relying on it.