IP Case Digest · Patents

Daikin Industries Ltd v. Controller of Patents and Designs, CMA(PT) 25/2023

Case number
CMA(PT) 25/2023
Date of judgment
Outcome
Set aside

Headnote

The claims were amended three times during prosecution. The order took some claims from the original set and others from the amended set and decided the two mismatched together, so it never decided the claims actually before the Controller. A little care would have avoided the litigation.

Read the judgment (PDF)

Disposition

Allowed. Order of refusal set aside.

Headnote by BRB Legal, written from the judgment: a summary for reference, not legal advice. Read the judgment itself before relying on it.