- Case number
- C.A.(COMM.IPD-TM) 142/2021
- Court
- Delhi High Court
- Date of judgment
- Judge
- Anish Dayal
- Outcome
- Dismissed
Headnote
A delay of 425 days was not condoned, the explanation being specious, cursory and flimsy, and the merits failed too. The cited marks were structurally and phonetically similar and registered for a similar category of goods, and to draw a distinction between tyres and automobiles would be too tenuous. That two cited marks co-exist on the register is no excuse for a third.
Disposition
Dismissed. Pending applications disposed of as infructuous.
Headnote by BRB Legal, written from the judgment: a summary for reference, not legal advice. Read the judgment itself before relying on it.