IP Case Digest · Patents

Bigtec Private Limited v. The Assistant Controller of Patents and Designs, (T)CMA(PT) 8/2023

Case number
(T)CMA(PT) 8/2023
Date of judgment
Judge
Senthilkumar Ramamoorthy
Outcome
Remanded

Headnote

A consent remand on terms. The applicant agreed to reconsideration subject to two conditions, that it be confined to the grounds on which the application was refused and the prior art cited in the impugned order, and that it be by a different officer. The Registry agreed to the first on instructions and the Court imposed the second.

Read the judgment (PDF)

Disposition

Disposed of without expressing any opinion on the merits. Impugned order set aside on the ground of non-consideration of the contentions raised on the cited prior art, and the matter remanded on conditions.

Headnote by BRB Legal, written from the judgment: a summary for reference, not legal advice. Read the judgment itself before relying on it.