IP Case Digest · Patents

Bigtec Private Limited v. The Assistant Controller of Patents and Designs, (T)CMA(PT) 4/2023

Case number
(T)CMA(PT) 4/2023
Date of judgment
Judge
Senthilkumar Ramamoorthy
Outcome
Set aside

Headnote

The companion appeal, on another application of the same applicant, decided the same day on identical terms. A consent remand, confined to the grounds on which the application was refused and to the prior art cited in the impugned order, and to be undertaken by a different officer so as to preclude confirmation bias.

Read the judgment (PDF)

Disposition

Disposed of. Impugned order set aside on the ground of non-consideration of the contentions raised on the cited prior art and on the section 3(e) objection. No opinion on the merits.

Headnote by BRB Legal, written from the judgment: a summary for reference, not legal advice. Read the judgment itself before relying on it.