- Case number
- CMA(PT) 32/2023
- Court
- Madras High Court
- Date of judgment
- Outcome
- Remanded
Headnote
Section 3(k) covers totally different things, so a Controller refusing under it must narrow the reasoning down to the part he is applying. The hearing notice said the claims were a computer program and a computer implementable method; the order abandoned that objection and concluded the subject matter was mathematical or statistical, depriving the applicant of a fair opportunity to answer.
Disposition
Remitted to the respondent for fresh consideration after a fair opportunity to the appellant.
Headnote by BRB Legal, written from the judgment: a summary for reference, not legal advice. Read the judgment itself before relying on it.