- Case number
- CMA(PT) 16/2023
- Court
- Madras High Court
- Date of judgment
- Judge
- N. Seshasayee
- Outcome
- Set aside
Headnote
Three prior arts were relied on in the hearing notice and answered with written submissions and evidence. The order discussed neither, and even on the one document it did address it merely extracted passages from the examination report. The patent office should not be seen as killing the scientific temper of the citizens of this country.
Disposition
Allowed. Order of refusal set aside.
Headnote by BRB Legal, written from the judgment: a summary for reference, not legal advice. Read the judgment itself before relying on it.